30 May 2026

Graduate earnings vs entry tariff: UK universities that outperform

Some UK universities accept nearly every applicant and still produce graduates who out-earn those from selective institutions. We compared offer rates and five-year earnings across 138 universities to find the ones that deliver the best outcomes for the widest range of students.

138
Universities assessed
£30,700
Median 5-year earnings
53
Overperformers
5
Underperformers

Why this matters for international students

International students pay the same tuition fees whether a university accepts 15% or 95% of applicants. A student paying £20,000 per year at a highly selective university needs to get in first. If another university charges similar fees, accepts most applicants, and produces graduates who earn within a few thousand pounds of the selective one, the accessible university is the better bet for most students.

Education advisors talk a lot about prestige and rankings. Parents ask about league tables. But none of these answer the question that matters most: what will my child earn five years after graduating, and what are the chances of getting a place?

This analysis answers both questions at once. We used official data on offer rates (the percentage of applicants who receive an offer) and graduate earnings five years after graduation to identify universities that deliver strong outcomes without the admissions lottery.

The sector picture: selectivity is concentrating

The UK higher education market is splitting. Russell Group universities now account for a record 29% of all enrolments. Applicant growth is structurally skewed: higher-tariff institutions saw applications grow 6.9%, medium tariff 2.8%, and lower tariff just 1.8%. The 2026 record of 338,940 UK 18-year-old applicants is a population event driven by a larger birth cohort, not a rise in participation rates.

At the same time, intakes at several lower-tariff institutions have fallen 20-30%. The market is concentrating around institutions that can attract students, and the gap between the most and least selective is widening.

For international students, this concentration creates an opportunity. As domestic applicants crowd into Russell Group universities, accessible institutions are competing harder for international students. Many of these universities deliver graduate earnings that match or beat their selective neighbours. The data below shows exactly which ones.

How we measured this

Offer rate is the percentage of applicants who receive an offer of a place. A high offer rate (above 70%) means most applicants get in. A low offer rate (below 50%) means the university is highly selective.

Five-year earnings is the median salary of graduates five years after completing their degree, published by the Department for Education via the Longitudinal Education Outcomes (LEO) dataset.

Overperformers have an offer rate above 70% (accessible) and earnings above the sector median of £30,700. Underperformers have an offer rate below 50% (selective) and earnings below the sector median.

The value score in the final table divides five-year earnings by (100 minus the offer rate). This rewards high earnings at accessible institutions.

Overperformers: accessible universities with strong earnings

53 universities combine an offer rate above 70% with graduate earnings above the sector median. These are institutions where most applicants receive an offer and graduates go on to earn well. For advisors, these are the universities that deserve a closer look when a student does not have the grades for the most selective institutions.

# University City Offer rate 5yr earnings Employment
1 University of Warwick Coventry 80.0% £44,500 87.9%
2 Durham University Durham 79.5% £43,800 86.1%
3 University of Bristol Bristol 74.7% £43,100 87.1%
4 Escape Studios London 90.0% £42,000 78.6%
5 Loughborough University Loughborough 75.0% £41,200 89.9%
6 University of Nottingham Nottingham 76.1% £40,400 88.9%
7 University of Exeter Exeter 92.4% £39,800 86.9%
8 University of Birmingham Birmingham 76.6% £38,700 88.7%
9 Newcastle University Newcastle 81.9% £38,300 88.9%
10 University of Surrey Guildford 72.1% £38,300 89.9%
11 Aston University Birmingham 80.1% £37,600 86.8%
12 University of Aberdeen Aberdeen 90.1% £37,600 84.6%
13 University of Southampton Southampton 80.6% £37,200 88.9%
14 University of Strathclyde Glasgow 72.8% £37,200 88.3%
15 University of Glasgow Glasgow 79.0% £36,500 84.8%
16 University of Sheffield Sheffield 78.1% £36,100 88.5%
17 Cardiff University Cardiff 76.2% £36,100 88.7%
18 Brunel University London London 75.6% £35,800 86.7%
19 University of Reading Reading 90.4% £35,800 89.8%
20 Lancaster University Lancaster 88.6% £35,400 87.7%
21 Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh 100.5% £35,400 86.9%
22 University of Leicester Leicester 73.1% £35,400 88.7%
23 University of Dundee Dundee 73.2% £35,000 87.7%
24 University of Sussex Brighton 94.7% £34,700 86.2%
25 University of York York 86.4% £34,700 88.4%
26 University of Liverpool Liverpool 75.8% £34,300 88.3%
27 Robert Gordon University Aberdeen 91.4% £33,900 89.5%
28 Bournemouth University Bournemouth 93.7% £33,600 90.5%
29 Oxford Brookes University Oxford 92.1% £33,600 87.5%
30 University of Kent Canterbury 98.0% £33,600 87.6%
31 Royal Holloway, University of London Egham 89.4% £33,200 87.2%
32 Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow 85.0% £33,200 89.5%
33 UEA Norwich 84.9% £33,200 88.0%
34 University of Brighton Brighton 87.2% £32,800 86.2%
35 University of Hertfordshire Hatfield 71.7% £32,800 87.9%
36 University of Greenwich London 89.5% £32,800 85.1%
37 Birkbeck, University of London London 90.3% £32,500 75.9%
38 University of Portsmouth Portsmouth 85.1% £32,100 89.0%
39 Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh 85.5% £32,100 87.5%
40 Keele University Keele 72.4% £32,100 89.9%
41 Kingston University Kingston upon Thames 86.7% £31,900 84.1%
42 University of Essex Colchester 89.2% £31,800 87.5%
43 Swansea University Swansea 79.8% £31,800 88.8%
44 University of Westminster London 85.3% £31,400 80.9%
45 UWE Bristol Bristol 87.5% £31,400 89.1%
46 Coventry University London Coventry 97.6% £31,400 86.9%
47 Nottingham Trent University Nottingham 99.4% £31,000 89.0%
48 University of Stirling Stirling 95.5% £31,000 88.4%
49 Northumbria University Newcastle 103.1% £31,000 89.6%
50 St Mary's University, Twickenham London 91.2% £31,000 86.4%
51 Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford 93.8% £30,700 87.1%
52 Harper Adams University Newport 115.8% £33,600 91.1%
53 The Royal Agricultural University Cirencester 122.7% £33,200 83.9%

The standout names on this list include Exeter (92.4% offer rate, £39,800 earnings), Aberdeen (90.1% offer rate, £37,600 earnings) and Lancaster (88.6% offer rate, £35,400 earnings). These are universities where a student with solid but not exceptional grades can reasonably expect both a place and a strong salary outcome.

Compare any two universities

Every university on UniLens has earnings, offer rates, employment data and more on a single profile page.

Browse all 415 universities →

Underperformers: selective universities with modest earnings

Five universities have an offer rate below 50% (meaning they reject more than half of applicants) and still produce graduates who earn below the sector median. These are institutions where getting in is hard but the salary payoff is not proportional to the selectivity.

# University City Offer rate 5yr earnings Employment
1 Rose Bruford College London 25.1% £23,200 91.4%
2 LIPA Liverpool 19.6% £24,200 87.7%
3 Glyndwr University Wrexham 47.4% £24,800 83.2%
4 Royal Conservatoire of Scotland Glasgow 19.2% £26,600 87.2%
5 Glasgow School of Art Glasgow 46.3% £27,000 86.7%

All five are specialist arts or performing arts institutions. This is consistent with what the Institute for Fiscal Studies has found: lifetime returns on creative arts degrees are close to zero for males and negative for females. These institutions are highly selective because of the audition and portfolio process, not because of academic grade requirements. But the earnings data is clear: selectivity in the arts does not translate to salary outcomes the way it does in other subjects.

This does not mean these are bad universities. Graduates from performing arts programmes often pursue portfolio careers where salary is not the primary measure of success. But for an international student or their family making a £60,000+ investment, the earnings data should be part of the conversation.

Three comparisons that tell the story

Aberdeen vs Edinburgh: same earnings, different odds

The University of Aberdeen and the University of Edinburgh both produce graduates who earn £37,600 five years after graduation. The difference is in who gets through the door. Edinburgh has an offer rate of 55.5%, meaning it rejects nearly half of applicants. Aberdeen's offer rate is 90.1%, meaning nearly everyone who applies gets a place.

An international student choosing between these two universities should know that the graduate salary outcome is identical. Aberdeen is also in one of the most affordable Scottish cities, with lower rent and lower living costs than Edinburgh. For a student paying £20,000 per year in tuition, Aberdeen delivers the same five-year earnings with a much higher probability of admission.

Exeter: a Russell Group university that accepts 92% of applicants

Exeter is the most interesting name on the overperformers list. It has a 92.4% offer rate, making it one of the most accessible Russell Group universities. Its five-year graduate earnings of £39,800 put it ahead of Birmingham (£38,700, 76.6% offer rate), Sheffield (£36,100, 78.1% offer rate) and Glasgow (£36,500, 79.0% offer rate). Exeter combines high accessibility with earnings that beat many of its more selective peers.

Nottingham Trent vs University of Nottingham: the £9,400 question

Nottingham Trent University has a 99.4% offer rate and produces graduates who earn £31,000. The University of Nottingham has a 76.1% offer rate and produces graduates who earn £40,400. The gap is £9,400 per year, five years after graduation.

This is one of the clearest cases where selectivity does predict higher earnings. Both universities are in the same city with the same living costs. For a strong student who can get into both, the University of Nottingham is the better financial bet. But for a student who cannot realistically get into the Russell Group university, NTU still delivers above-median graduate earnings with near-certain admission.

The full picture: top 20 universities by value score

The value score divides five-year earnings by the selectivity gap (100 minus the offer rate). This rewards universities that combine high earnings with high accessibility. A university that produces £35,000 earners while accepting 90% of applicants scores higher than one producing the same earners while accepting 70%.

# University City Offer rate 5yr earnings Employment Value score
1 Nottingham Trent University Nottingham 99.4% £31,000 89.0% 51,667
2 Cardiff Metropolitan University Cardiff 99.4% £28,200 89.0% 47,000
3 University of Kent Canterbury 98.0% £33,600 87.6% 16,800
4 University of Winchester Winchester 97.9% £28,800 89.0% 13,714
5 Coventry University London Coventry 97.6% £31,400 86.9% 13,083
6 De Montfort University Leicester 97.1% £28,500 87.7% 9,828
7 University of Bradford Bradford 96.3% £28,100 84.8% 7,595
8 University of Stirling Stirling 95.5% £31,000 88.4% 6,889
9 University of Sussex Brighton 94.7% £34,700 86.2% 6,547
10 Edge Hill University Ormskirk 95.8% £27,700 89.0% 6,595
11 University of the West of Scotland Paisley 95.1% £28,800 88.3% 5,878
12 Bournemouth University Bournemouth 93.7% £33,600 90.5% 5,333
13 University of Exeter Exeter 92.4% £39,800 86.9% 5,237
14 Anglia Ruskin University Chelmsford 93.8% £30,700 87.1% 4,952
15 Liverpool Hope University Liverpool 94.7% £25,900 85.7% 4,887
16 University of Gloucestershire Cheltenham 94.1% £27,400 90.5% 4,644
17 University of South Wales Pontypridd 93.8% £27,400 88.2% 4,419
18 Oxford Brookes University Oxford 92.1% £33,600 87.5% 4,253
19 Canterbury Christ Church University Canterbury 99.9% £29,900 88.0% 299,000
20 University of Reading Reading 90.4% £35,800 89.8% 3,729

The value score formula naturally favours institutions with offer rates close to 100%, because the denominator approaches zero. Canterbury Christ Church, for example, has a 99.9% offer rate which produces an extreme score. The formula is a starting point for comparison, not a definitive ranking. The overperformers table above is more useful for practical advising because it combines accessibility with absolute earnings quality.

What this means for education advisors

The OfS uses graduate outcomes as one of its measures of institutional quality. The graduate salary premium over non-graduate salary has remained flat at around £10,000, which means the university a student attends makes a bigger difference than whether they attend at all.

For advisors working with international students and their families, three practical steps follow from this data:

  1. Show parents the value comparisons. When a family is set on a selective university because of its name, show them an accessible university in the same city or region with similar earnings. Aberdeen vs Edinburgh is the clearest example: identical outcomes, much higher probability of admission, lower living costs.
  2. Use offer rates to manage expectations. If a student has a realistic chance of getting into a university with a 75% offer rate but not one with a 30% offer rate, the overperformers list shows which accessible universities still deliver strong earnings. Do not let students gamble their entire application on a single selective institution when strong alternatives exist.
  3. Look at employment alongside earnings. High earnings with low employment rates can mean the data is skewed by a small number of high earners. Universities like Bournemouth (90.5% employment, £33,600 earnings) and Loughborough (89.9% employment, £41,200 earnings) combine strong earnings with high employment rates, meaning the outcomes are broad-based.

Check any university now

Search all 415 universities on UniLens and see earnings, offer rates, employment and financial stability on a single profile page.

Browse universities →

Data sources

Graduate earnings data comes from the Longitudinal Education Outcomes (LEO) dataset published by the Department for Education. Offer rate data comes from UCAS. Employment rates come from the Graduate Outcomes survey published by HESA.

Sector context draws on published analysis from the OfS, UCAS End of Cycle reports, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, and the House of Commons Education Committee. The sector median of £30,700 is calculated across all 151 institutions with published five-year earnings data.

The 138 universities in this analysis are those with both published five-year earnings data and published UCAS offer rate data. Institutions without one or both figures are excluded.

A note on offer rates above 100%

Some institutions show offer rates above 100%. This happens when a university makes more offers than it receives applications, typically through Clearing, adjusted offers, or changes in how UCAS counts applications. An offer rate above 100% means the university is actively seeking students beyond its applicant pool. For the value score calculation, these institutions are included but their scores should be interpreted with this context.